In 2014, I wrote a blog. “Eckhart Tolle is on the rich man’s list. Is this the price of enlightenment?” I have added a further comment.

In 2014, I wrote a critique on the wealth of Eckhart Tolle, the well-known spiritual teacher and author of THE POWER OF NOW, one of the mostly widely read spiritual books in the last two decades.

The critique encouraged a recommendation to Mr Tolle to offer all or some of his teachings on dana (donation) for the single parent, student, low income, unemployed and elderly to have the opportunity to attend his retreats. People in the low-income category can only use Youtube for his teachings, which have been important for many people. He only offers residential teachings for the wealthy and online teachings for those with significant disposable income.

The blog received a wide range of comments from strong appreciations to fierce criticisms. I believe this blog may have had more responses than any other of my blogs.  Readers comments are at the foot of the 2014 blog. Some have strong views and emotions around money issues. This is the link to the blog followed below is my response in the Comments section.

Eckhart Tolle is on the Rich Man’s List. Is this the price of enlightenment?

For the first time, I added today 02 May 2021, a short response.

Thank you for all your comments over seven years of my 2014 blog on the wealth of Eckhart Tolle. I have received a full range of appreciations and criticisms of my concerns about spirituality and accumulation of immense wealth. Thank you for taking the time to write.

Jesus said: “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” (Matthew 19.23). I still agree with Jesus, who stated this on more than one occasion.

Eckhart’s wealth at that time was estimated at $15,000,000. Today, the net worth of Eckhart Tolle is around $80,000,000 according to the website.

The global pandemic has currently blocked the opportunity for all, regardless of income, to attend public events of spiritual teachers, and others. The wealthy and the poor can unite on YouTube to listen to his teachings.

It might be that Eckhart finds himself in the unenviable position of being a marketable product. Eckhart comes across as a kindly man. He may lack the power and authority to insist the Eckhart Tolle Foundation offers regular affordable residential/Zoom teachings for those who wish to see him in person or ask direct questions, via Zoom.

My concern has not changed. What is the problem of offering residential/Zoom teachings to those struggling to make ends meet?

Does Mr. Tolle and his Foundation think people, who attend on a donation basis or pay a minimal charge, do not have the same level of commitment as those with significant disposable income? Are low-income people left to view Youtube talks?

I googled Eckhart Tolle and money. There are plenty of critical responses to his expensive courses ranging from several hundred dollars to thousands of dollars. Expensive courses tend to reinforce a common view that spiritual teachers are in it for the money. Eckhart is a prominent name in spirituality. His teachings attract people to spiritual practices. but his accumulation of immense wealth also puts people off spirituality.

What Eckhart said about money

In an interview in 2010, Eckhart said: “An enlightened person or business is not concerned primarily with making money, because when you are concerned with making money you want the future more than the present.”

A spiritual person does not have to be lost in futuristic thinking around money to get on the Rich Man’s List.  He or she simply shows little awareness of accumulating staggering wealth through their spiritual business.  This may show a lack of empathy for those with modest or little income who would benefit from his guidance.

Is it appropriate to use money as the criterion for access to a spiritual teacher in the real world or in a Zoom session?

There is more to life than just living in the Now.

May all spiritual teachings in the physical world be available to all regardless of income

May all being understand the co-dependency of past, present and future

May all beings understand the timeless – unbound to the now

  • I have a number of Tolle’s books and often listen to his talks on YouTube. Whilst I find his words insightful and inspirational I can’t see anything wrong in asking how the fortune that he acquires sits with his spiritual teaching. I can see something wrong in assuming that someone who asks that question is jealous.

  • Diamond D get a life . Every comment you made about Titmuss is , back at ya , full of sourness and jealousy. I’ve known him him for years and this guy walks his talk. Get a grip on your anger


    The articles from Titmuss indicate quite transparently his issues and problems and hot buttons and his own attachment to money, which he glaringly has not worked through and needs to, because until he does his opinion pieces will continue to be in the same vein (rut) of simple jealousy and sour grapes. I can’t find in them any indication of spiritual advancement, spiritual teachings, or spiritual anything. Just unhappiness with the success and AUTHENTICITY of another teacher’s work, in this case Eckhart Tolle.

    Tolle’s work is excellent. And it is accessible to everyone, whether they listen to the free books and talks online or choose to pay for the classes and trainings and in person lectures. Just today i listened to one of his talks online and he spoke at length on the charitable foundation he has established to donate his wealth and continue the donations after he passes. And yes his donations are anonymous. The highest form of charity is anonymous. Where the giver is not wallowing in ego expecting adulation and praise for their generosity, or using it as publicity for their business. And where the recipient does not know the source of the money. That is what giving looks like, it is not visible, it is not fodder for your gossip and jealousy.

    Focus on doing the work. Eckhart Tolle walks the talk. I can’t say the same for Mr. Titmuss’ articles.

  • I’m not a Christian but I agree with Jesus also.

    I’m not sure why it’s so universally accepted that consumer capitalism is the only way of living as a human being? Or even the *preferred* way…

    Why base your society on one of the worst aspects of the human psyche instead of the nicer traits?

    There have been many examples of better organisation in the past but they all seem to have got stomped on .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.